Start your day with intelligence. Get The OODA Daily Pulse.

Home > Analysis > On Nomads, Nomadism, the Emergence of the Nation-State, and Digital Nomadism

The essence of digital nomadism lies in the freedom to choose one’s location, often leading to a life of travel and exploration. This lifestyle is not confined to any particular profession but is characterized by the ability to work independently of a fixed office space. Digital nomads often frequent co-working spaces, cafes, and other public places that offer reliable internet access, creating a dynamic and ever-changing work environment.  We explore the digital nomadic lifestyle and the global community of purveyors of the life of a digital nomad through the prism of our Digital Self-Sovereignty Research Initiative.  

What is Digital Nomadism?

Nomadism represents a shift towards a more fluid and interconnected world, where technology enables individuals to pursue their passions and careers without being tied to a specific location.

Digital nomadism is a lifestyle that leverages technology to allow individuals to work remotely from anywhere in the world:  This movement has gained significant traction in recent years, driven by advancements in digital tools and a growing desire for flexibility and autonomy in work arrangements. Digital nomads typically use laptops, smartphones, and internet connectivity to perform their jobs, which can range from freelance writing and graphic design to software development and consulting.  One of the key benefits of digital nomadism is the ability to achieve a better work-life balance. By breaking free from the traditional 9-to-5 office routine, digital nomads can structure their days in ways that maximize productivity and personal fulfillment. This flexibility can lead to increased job satisfaction and overall well-being.

Digital nomadism also presents unique challenges. Maintaining a stable internet connection, managing time zones, and dealing with the lack of a permanent home base can be daunting – digital nomads must navigate the complexities of visas, taxes, and healthcare in different countries, which requires careful planning and adaptability. 

The rise of digital nomadism has also had broader implications for the global economy and urban development:  Cities around the world are increasingly catering to this demographic by offering digital nomad visas, creating co-working spaces, and fostering communities that support remote workers. This trend is reshaping the way we think about work and travel, blurring the lines between professional and personal life.

Nomadism represents a shift towards a more fluid and interconnected world, where technology enables individuals to pursue their passions and careers without being tied to a specific location.  It embodies the spirit of innovation and adaptability, qualities that are increasingly valuable in our rapidly changing global landscape.

The History of Digital Nomadism

…digital nomadism will continue to grow and adapt, offering new opportunities and challenges…

The history of digital nomadism is a fascinating journey that intertwines technological advancements, cultural shifts, and evolving work paradigms. The concept of working remotely is not entirely new, but the digital nomad lifestyle as we know it today has its roots in the late 20th century, with significant developments occurring over the past few decades.

Early Beginnings: The advent of personal computers and the Internet sowed the seeds of digital nomadism in the 1980s and 1990s. Early adopters of remote work were often tech enthusiasts and freelancers who leveraged these new tools to break free from traditional office environments. However, the infrastructure and societal acceptance of remote work were still in their infancy.

The Dot-Com Boom:  The late 1990s and early 2000s saw the dot-com boom, which further propelled the idea of remote work. Companies began to explore the potential of the internet to facilitate communication and collaboration across distances. This period also saw the rise of the “nomadic worker” concept, where marketing campaigns envisioned a future where employees could work from anywhere, a vision that seemed far-fetched at the time.

The Rise of Web 2.0:  The mid-2000s marked a significant turning point with the rise of Web 2.0 technologies. Social media platforms, cloud computing, and improved internet connectivity made it easier for individuals to work remotely. Tools like Skype, Google Docs, and Dropbox became essential for digital nomads, enabling seamless communication and collaboration.

 The Great Recession:  The 2008 financial crisis played a crucial role in accelerating the digital nomad movement. As traditional job markets contracted, many individuals turned to freelancing and remote work out of necessity. This period saw a surge in the number of people exploring alternative work arrangements, laying the groundwork for the digital nomad lifestyle.

The Gig Economy:  The 2010s witnessed the rise of the gig economy, characterized by short-term contracts and freelance work. Platforms like Upwork, Fiverr, and Airbnb provided opportunities for individuals to monetize their skills and assets, further fueling the digital nomad trend. This era also saw the proliferation of co-working spaces, which catered to the needs of remote workers and fostered a sense of community.

The Digital Nomad Movement:  By the mid-2010s, digital nomadism had evolved from a niche lifestyle to a mainstream movement. Influential figures like Pieter Levels, founder of Nomad List, and Kristin Wilson, a long-time digital nomad, shared their experiences and insights, inspiring others to embrace this way of life. Communities and programs like Remote Year and Nomad Cruise emerged, offering structured opportunities for digital nomads to travel and work together.

The COVID-19 Pandemic:  The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 was a watershed moment for remote work and digital nomadism. As lockdowns and travel restrictions forced millions to work from home, the feasibility and benefits of remote work became evident to a broader audience. Companies and employees alike began to reconsider the necessity of traditional office spaces, leading to a more widespread acceptance of remote work.

The Present and Future:  Today, digital nomadism is a well-established lifestyle with a robust ecosystem of tools, communities, and support systems. Cities like Chiang Mai, Bali, and Lisbon have become hotspots for digital nomads, offering affordable living, reliable internet, and vibrant communities. Governments have also taken notice, with countries like Estonia and Barbados introducing digital nomad governments have also taken notice, with countries like Estonia and Barbados introducing digital nomad visas to attract remote workers. These initiatives reflect a growing recognition of the economic and cultural contributions that digital nomads can bring to local communities.

The history of digital nomadism is a testament to the transformative power of technology and the human desire for freedom and flexibility. From its early beginnings in the 1980s to its current status as a global movement, digital nomadism has continually evolved, driven by technological advancements, economic shifts, and changing cultural attitudes. As we look to the future, it is likely that digital nomadism will continue to grow and adapt, offering new opportunities and challenges for those who choose to embrace this dynamic lifestyle.

What Next?  Past is Prologue

Nomads and Nomadism over the Centuries

The history of nomads is a fascinating journey through time, marked by their unique ways of life, their interactions with sedentary societies, and their impact on the development of the modern nation-state.

The interplay between nomadic and sedentary societies has been a driving force in the evolution of human civilization. As nation-states emerged and solidified their borders, the role of nomads shifted, but their impact on history remains undeniable. The lessons learned from their adaptability and strategic innovations continue to inform modern approaches to conflict and cooperation.

Nomadism, characterized by the movement of people across territories in search of resources, has been a significant force in shaping human history. One of the earliest and most notable periods of nomadism is associated with the nomads of the Eurasian steppes, such as the Scythians, Huns, and Mongols.  These groups were known for their exceptional horsemanship and military prowess. The Mongols, under the leadership of Genghis Khan, created one of the largest empires in history by the 13th century, stretching from Europe to Asia. Their tactics, which combined psychological shock and physical speed, allowed them to conquer vast territories and influence the course of history 1 .

The relationship between nomads and sedentary societies has often been one of conflict and cooperation:  Nomadic groups would frequently raid settled areas for resources, but they also engaged in trade and cultural exchange. The Silk Road, for instance, was a critical trade route that connected the East and West, facilitated by the mobility of nomadic traders.

The constant threat of nomadic invasions, such as those by the Huns and later the Mongols, played a role in the consolidation of power by local rulers.  The emergence of the nation-state in Europe can be traced back to the late Middle Ages and the early modern period:  during this time, the political landscape of Europe was highly fragmented, with numerous small kingdoms and principalities.  These rulers sought to create more stable and defensible territories, which eventually led to the formation of larger, more centralized states.

In summary, the history of nomads is also a story of adaptation and resilience:  from the steppes of Eurasia to the deserts of the Middle East and the plains of North America, nomadic groups have navigated the challenges of their environments and the pressures of encroaching sedentary societies. Their legacy is evident in the cultural, military, and economic influences they have left behind.

Nomadism and the Emergence of the Nation-state

The adaptability and strategic innovations of nomadic societies have left a lasting legacy on the formation and evolution of modern nation-states.

The concept of the nation-state, characterized by a defined territory, centralized government, and a sense of national identity, began to take shape in the 16th and 17th centuries. The Peace of Westphalia in 1648, which ended the Thirty Years’ War, is often cited as a significant milestone in the development of the modern nation-state. This treaty established the principles of territorial sovereignty and non-interference in the internal affairs of other states, laying the groundwork for the international system we know today.

Nomadic societies, with their fluid and adaptable social structures, presented a stark contrast to the rigid, hierarchical organization of emerging nation-states. The mobility of nomads allowed them to exploit the weaknesses of sedentary societies, but it also made it difficult for them to establish permanent political structures. As a result, many nomadic groups were eventually absorbed or displaced by expanding nation-states.

In the context of military history, the tactics of nomadic armies influenced the development of modern warfare. The skirmishing techniques and flexible maneuvers of nomadic warriors were later adopted by European armies, leading to the evolution of more dynamic and adaptable military strategies.  This shift from rigid formations to more fluid tactics can be seen as a response to the challenges posed by nomadic adversaries.

The relationship between nomadism and the nation-state is also evident in the cultural and economic exchanges that took place along the borders of these two worlds. Nomadic traders and craftsmen brought new goods, technologies, and ideas to sedentary societies, contributing to their development and prosperity. Conversely, the expansion of nation-states often led to the displacement and marginalization of nomadic groups, as governments sought to exert control over their territories and resources.

The relationship between nomads and the emergence of the nation-state is complex and deeply intertwined with the evolution of military tactics, economic structures, and political boundaries. To further explore this relationship, let’s delve into additional historical examples and contexts that highlight the dynamic interplay between nomadic societies and the formation of nation-states:  the dynamic interplay between nomadic societies and the formation of nation-states is evident in the histories of the Mongol Empire, the Huns, the Islamic Caliphates, the Ottoman Empire, the Russian Empire, and the Qing Dynasty. These historical examples highlight the significant impact that nomadic groups had on the development of state structures, military tactics, and political boundaries. The adaptability and strategic innovations of nomadic societies have left a lasting legacy on the formation and evolution of modern nation-states:

  • One significant example is the role of the Mongol Empire in shaping the political landscape of Eurasia. The Mongols, under the leadership of Genghis Khan and his successors, created an empire that spanned from China to Eastern Europe. Their conquests and the subsequent Pax Mongolica facilitated unprecedented levels of trade, cultural exchange, and communication across the continent. The Mongol Empire’s administrative practices, such as the use of a postal relay system and the promotion of meritocracy, influenced the governance structures of the states that emerged in its wake. The fragmentation of the Mongol Empire eventually led to the rise of new political entities, such as the Yuan Dynasty in China and the Ilkhanate in Persia, which incorporated elements of Mongol governance into their own state apparatus.
  • Another illustrative case is the impact of the Huns on the Roman Empire. The Huns, a confederation of nomadic tribes from Central Asia, exerted immense pressure on the Roman frontiers during the 4th and 5th centuries CE. Their incursions and the resulting displacement of other barbarian groups, such as the Goths, contributed to the destabilization of the Western Roman Empire. The eventual fall of Rome in 476 CE marked a significant turning point in European history, leading to the fragmentation of the empire into smaller, feudal states. The legacy of the Huns and other nomadic groups can be seen in the formation of these early medieval polities, which laid the groundwork for the modern nation-states of Europe.
  • The relationship between nomads and sedentary societies is also evident in the history of the Islamic Caliphates. The early Islamic conquests in the 7th and 8th centuries were driven by the mobility and military prowess of Arab Bedouin tribes. These nomadic warriors played a crucial role in the rapid expansion of the Islamic Empire, which stretched from Spain to India at its height. The integration of nomadic tribes into the administrative and military structures of the Caliphates helped to consolidate their power and maintain control over vast territories. The Umayyad and Abbasid Caliphates, in particular, relied on the support of nomadic groups to secure their frontiers and project their influence.
  • In the context of the Ottoman Empire, the role of nomadic tribes was similarly significant. The Ottomans, who originated as a small Turkic nomadic group in Anatolia, rose to prominence in the 14th and 15th centuries. Their ability to mobilize and integrate other nomadic and semi-nomadic groups into their military and administrative systems was a key factor in their success. The Ottoman Empire’s use of the devshirme system, which recruited Christian boys from the Balkans to serve as elite soldiers and administrators, is an example of how they adapted and incorporated diverse elements into their state apparatus. The Ottomans’ ability to balance the interests of nomadic and sedentary populations contributed to the longevity and stability of their empire.
  • The relationship between nomads and the emergence of nation-states is also reflected in the history of the Russian Empire. The expansion of Muscovy in the 15th and 16th centuries involved the subjugation of various nomadic groups, such as the Tatars and Cossacks. These groups played a crucial role in the expansion of Russian territory into Siberia and Central Asia. The Russian state employed a combination of military force, strategic alliances, and the incorporation of nomadic military tactics to extend its influence. The integration of these nomadic groups into the Russian Empire’s administrative and military structures helped to solidify its control over vast and diverse territories.
  • The relationship between nomads and the emergence of nation-states is also evident in the history of the Qing Dynasty in China. The Manchus, who founded the Qing Dynasty in the 17th century, were originally semi-nomadic people from the northeastern region of China. Their ability to mobilize and integrate other nomadic and semi-nomadic groups, such as the Mongols, into their military and administrative systems was a key factor in their success. The Qing Dynasty’s use of the Eight Banners system, which organized military and administrative units based on ethnic and tribal affiliations, is an example of how they adapted and incorporated diverse elements into their state apparatus. The Qing Dynasty’s ability to balance the interests of nomadic and sedentary populations contributed to the longevity and stability of their empire.

Additional OODA Loop Resources

For our News Briefs and Original Analysis research efforts to date on this topic, go to OODA Loop | Digital Self-Sovereignty

Related topics include:    OODA Loop | Blockchain    OODA Loop | Trust      OODA Loop | Zero Trust    OODA Loop | Trustworthy AI

The OODA Loop Digital Self-Sovereignty Research Initiative:  Digital self-sovereignty is the new “build”  as legacy systems get swapped out in a sometimes violent, always exponential fashion. To be clear, we are positioning digital self-sovereignty as a solution to our current problem set that will “still stand” even if this current geopolitical, exponential technology-driven inflection point manifests  – for a prolonged period  – as dark age-esque global societal systemic failure (per The Ministry of the Future). Ironically, this same uncertainty, chaos, and violence are the primary drivers (and new incentive structure) behind this new system’s development.  In this post, we “set levels” and offer working definitions for our forthcoming Q324 (going right into OODAcon 2024) series of posts as part of our Digital Self-Sovereignty Research Initiative.

Embracing Corporate Intelligence and Scenario Planning in an Uncertain Age: Businesses also confront unpredictable external threats besides traditional competitive challenges. This environment amplifies the significance of Scenario Planning. It enables leaders to envision varied futures, thereby identifying potential risks and opportunities. Regardless of size, all organizations should allocate time to refine their understanding of the current risk landscape and adapt their strategies. See: Scenario Planning

Bitcoin’s Momentum: Bitcoin seems unstoppable due to solid mathematical foundations and widespread societal acceptance. Other cryptocurrencies like Ethereum also gain prominence. The Metaverse’s rise is closely tied to Ethereum’s universal trust layer. See: Guide to Crypto Revolution

Geopolitical-Cyber Risk Nexus: The interconnectivity brought by the Internet has made regional issues affect global cyberspace. Now, every significant event has cyber implications, making it imperative for leaders to recognize and act upon the symbiosis between geopolitical and cyber risks. See The Cyber Threat

Track Technology-Driven Disruption: Businesses should examine technological drivers and future customer demands. A multidisciplinary knowledge of tech domains is essential for effective foresight. See Disruptive and Exponential Technologies.

Networked Extremism: The digital era enables extremists worldwide to collaborate, share strategies, and self-radicalize. Meanwhile, advanced technologies empower criminals, making corruption and crime interwoven challenges for global societies. See: Converging Insurgency, Crime and Corruption

Daniel Pereira

About the Author

Daniel Pereira

Daniel Pereira is research director at OODA. He is a foresight strategist, creative technologist, and an information communication technology (ICT) and digital media researcher with 20+ years of experience directing public/private partnerships and strategic innovation initiatives.