Start your day with intelligence. Get The OODA Daily Pulse.

Home > Analysis > OODA Original > Decision Intelligence > Scenario Planning at a Breaking Point: Adapting to Economic and Geopolitical Shocks

As reported by the Financial Times, the convergence of trade wars, geopolitical instability, and disruptive technologies is straining traditional scenario planning methods, forcing organizations to rethink their models for an increasingly volatile and ambiguous future. OODA Loop has been grappling with these issues for a while, which we capture in a compilation of our recent OODA Loop scenario planning “in practice” analyses, and recent posts designed as resources for your organization’s pivot vis-à-vis scenario planning and strategic foresight practices within your organization.

Why This Matters

In a world grappling with accelerating geopolitical tensions, economic decoupling, and technological disruption, organizations that rely on outdated scenario planning approaches risk being blindsided by cascading, complex crises.

  • Scenario planning is being tested across sectors, from supply chains to national security, due to cascading disruptions.
  • New approaches integrating AI, wargaming, and foresight methodologies are being trialed to address the paradox of early warning and decision paralysis.
  • Firms, governments, and investors are now looking beyond linear models, adopting dynamic and stress-tested scenario exercises.

Key Points

  • Trade Wars and Financial Turbulence: The rapid escalation of U.S.-China tensions, especially around tariffs and tech decoupling, is forcing supply chain managers and policymakers to model extreme disruptions.
  • Cryptocurrency and the Dollar Retreat: The weaponization of financial systems is driving interest in decentralized finance and alternative currencies, testing the assumptions behind global reserve currency dynamics.
  • Ports as Early Warning Systems: Observations at Los Angeles and Long Beach ports are serving as frontline indicators of supply chain stress and tariff shocks.
  • Scenario Planning Gaps in U.S. Threat Matrices: Existing U.S. threat scenarios often fail to incorporate the compounding effects of economic, technological, and military disruptions simultaneously.
  • New Tools Like GPTs and LLMs: Planners are experimenting with generative AI models to augment scenario planning and wargaming, though challenges remain around reliability and decision-useful outputs.

Summary: “Scenario Planning is Getting a Stress Test”

Traditional scenario planning is being overwhelmed by a perfect storm of geopolitical conflicts, financial decoupling, trade wars, and emerging technologies.

Organizations are struggling to adapt legacy models to today’s rapidly evolving and interconnected risks. New methods—ranging from wargaming to AI-augmented scenario generation—are being tested, but many decision-makers still face the paradox of early warning signals without timely, decisive action.

For a deeper dive, see the recent Financial Times article: Scenario planning is getting a stress test.

What Next?

  • Scenario planners will need to integrate hybrid methodologies, combining geopolitical forecasting, wargaming, and AI-driven models to capture complex feedback loops and cascading crises.
  • Governments may need to update national threat matrices to include more dynamic and fast-moving economic and technological warfare scenarios, as the current frameworks risk being outdated.
  • Corporate boards and investors should embrace scenario stress tests as routine exercises rather than optional activities, embedding them into strategic planning and risk governance.
  • Emerging best practices will likely incorporate ‘Swarm Intelligence’ and cross-domain simulations, enhancing agility in planning amid uncertainty.

OODA Loop: Scenario Planning and Foresight Strategy “In Practice”

  1. The Great Dollar Retreat?: Explores the strategic implications of financial decoupling, the rise of cryptocurrencies, and the erosion of the U.S. dollar’s global dominance.
  2. Ports Signal Tariff Turbulence: Uses port data from Los Angeles and Long Beach as real-time indicators of global trade disruptions and tariff-driven economic stress.
  3. Xi Jinping’s Last Decision: Applies wargaming methods to model the risk of full-spectrum economic warfare between the U.S. and China, identifying gaps in current threat matrices.
  4. The New Tariff Era – Navigating Disruption with Strategic Foresight: Advocates for integrating strategic foresight into corporate and policy planning to navigate unpredictable and disruptive tariff regimes.
  5. Strategic Access to Critical Minerals and Rare Earth Metals: Geopolitical Risks, Competition, and Supply Chain Resilience: Discusses geopolitical competition over minerals as a structural supply chain risk, emphasizing its role in energy, defense, and tech scenarios – with an emphasis on integration of mineral access risks into corporate scenario planning, emphasizing the need for resilience strategies in light of state-led economic coercion and chokepoint disruptions.
  6. Swarm Intelligence and Network Swarms: Future Scenarios: Explores the use of swarm intelligence and network swarms as future-forward tools for enhancing dynamic scenario planning and decision agility.

Scenario Planning for Global Computer Chip Supply Chain Disruption: Results of an OODA Stratigame

The OODA Stratigame on chip supply chain disruption revealed how geopolitical tensions, natural disasters, and policy interventions could create cascading, global semiconductor shortages.

Participants stress-tested various scenarios, identifying vulnerabilities in concentration risks, chokepoints, and a lack of strategic reserves. The game highlighted the need for diversified sourcing, stockpiling critical technologies, and integrating semiconductor disruption scenarios into national security planning.

See: Scenario Planning for Global Computer Chip Supply Chain Disruption: Results of an OODA Stratigame

OODA Loop: Scenario Planning – Innovation, and Best-in-Class Methodologies

OODA Loop Scenario Planning Resources: Comparison Table

Early-stage, experimentalFocus AreaStrengthsLimitationsEmerging Uses
Scenario Planning is Getting a Stress Test (FT)Cross-sector stress on traditional modelsExposes outdated assumptions in current modelsStill high-level, not operationalPromotes dynamic, stress-tested frameworks
The Great Dollar Retreat?Financial decoupling and DeFiHighlights shifts toward decentralized financeFocuses mostly on financial aspectsCrypto scenarios in financial planning
Ports Signal Tariff TurbulenceSupply chain disruptionsReal-time monitoring using port dataLess adaptable to digital/cyber risksIntegrating logistics into scenario dashboards
Xi Jinping’s Last DecisionPRC-US economic confrontationWargames’ extreme escalation scenariosFocused on U.S.-China; narrow framingUpdating wargaming for economic scenarios
The New Tariff Era: Navigating Disruption with Strategic ForesightStrategic foresight for tariffsEncourages foresight integrationUnderplays AI-driven disruptionsCorporate stress testing under tariffs
Applying GPTs and LLMs to Scenario PlanningAI-augmented scenario generationExpands ideation horizons quicklyBlack-box risks; decision-usefulness challengesHuman-in-the-loop scenario ideation
Foresight Strategy and Scenario Planning: Methods and Models for Assessing Future Risks and OpportunitiesModels for future risks and opportunitiesMethodologies for structured scenario developmentMay struggle to integrate fast-moving risksFoundations for integrating foresight with AI tools
Strategic Foresight and Scenario Planning for Emerging Critical Risks: A Framework for Anticipation and AdaptationFramework for anticipation and adaptationMulti-domain risk mapping, adaptive modelsLacks scenario stress testing emphasisAdaptive planning and resilience frameworks
Scenario Planning and the Paradox of WarningParadox of early warning and decision paralysisHighlights gaps in warning-to-action pathwaysDoes not resolve decision paralysisIncorporating wargaming into threat matrices
Swarm Intelligence and Network Swarms: Future ScenariosNetwork swarm futures and collective intelligenceUses swarm behavior for dynamic scenario modelingEarly-stage, experimentalNext-gen scenario agility using swarm intelligence
Daniel Pereira

About the Author

Daniel Pereira

Daniel Pereira is research director at OODA. He is a foresight strategist, creative technologist, and an information communication technology (ICT) and digital media researcher with 20+ years of experience directing public/private partnerships and strategic innovation initiatives.