Start your day with intelligence. Get The OODA Daily Pulse.
A very specific insight from our OODA Network Stratigame – Scenario Planning for Global Computer Chip Supply Chain Disruption was the role the foreign production of Specialized Manufacturing Equipment (SME) built for the manufacturing of computer chips would play in the health of the computer chip supply chain for the U.S. Of strategic concern:
ASML Holding, based in the Netherlands, is the sole provider of a vital technology used to manufacture computer chips: The company is the largest supplier of photolithography systems and the only producer of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines, which are used to etch circuits onto silicon wafers. The chips are later used by Apple, IBM, Samsung, and other tech giants.
Since late 2021, we have covered ASML Holding’s Factory Fire in Berlin in January 2022 – which raised concern about supply chain shortages based on the impact of the fire on ASML’s manufacturing capabilities – and, in February 2023, we provided an analysis of Semiconductor Supply Chain Espionage: Data Stolen from ASML’s Technical Repository for EUV Chip Machines.
ASML Holding remains the vital tracking mechanism for indicators in the ongoing “Chip Wars” between China, the EU, the U.S., and Japan.
Following are our most recent OODA Loop News Briefs on ASML Holding, followed by a specific story on the market workaround ASML Holdings is considering with some of its hardware to continue to sell into the Chinese market. We also provide further resources at the end of this post on the “Origins Story” of export controls which put ASML Holdings’ unique and vital EUV Chip Machines and Deep Ultraviolet Lithography (DUV) tool at the center of the global great power competition over semiconductor manufacturing, SME and component part supply chain availability.
June 30, 2023
https://oodaloop.com/briefs/2023/06/30/asml-hit-with-new-dutch-limits-on-chip-gear-exports-to-china/
June 22, 2023
https://oodaloop.com/briefs/2023/06/22/asml-says-decoupling-chip-supply-chain-is-practically-impossible/
Employees are seen working on the final assembly of ASML’s TWINSCAN NXE:3400B semiconductor lithography tool with its panels removed, in Veldhoven, Netherlands, in this picture taken April 4, 2019. Bart van Overbeeke Fotografie/ASML/Handout via REUTERS
The Dutch government has not yet defined crucial aspects of new restrictions on chip-technology exports to China including whether ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS) can service chip-printing machines the company has already sold in the country.
“Those details still need to be worked out,” Dutch Trade Minister Liesje Schreinemacher told reporters on Thursday in Stockholm.
Schreinmacher’s remarks highlight that, while the plan announced by the Dutch on Wednesday puts the Netherlands in broad alignment with U.S. goals of undermining China’s ability to make cutting-edge chips, ASML and its Chinese customers still do not know exactly how it will affect their businesses.
The Dutch firm, Europe’s largest technology by market capitalization, had 14% of its sales in China in 2022 and has sold more than 8 billion euros ($8.46 billion) worth of chip lithography equipment in China over the past decade.
Companies that buy its machines enter into service agreements with ASML for ongoing maintenance. The “installed base” segment contributed about 25% of ASML’s worldwide revenue in 2022.
ASML itself has for now repeated its guidance for 2023 of flat sales in China of around 2.2 billion euros. That compares with 25% revenue growth overall, illustrating the likely impact of the restrictions.
An ASML spokesperson said on Thursday the company interprets the government’s remarks to mean that only a thin additional slice of its second-best product line will now be restricted in China, following a complete ban on its most advanced machines in 2019.
But there is an element of guesswork to that. “ASML is waiting for more information” the spokesperson said.
ING analyst Marc Hesselink calculated that the new Dutch rules could possibly affect products that account for 10% of ASML’s worldwide sales. However, that would be a worst-case scenario and the impact will likely be less.
That’s because ASML customers in China include South Korean chipmakers SK Hynix Inc (000660.KS) and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (005930.KS), which will likely be granted licenses, as well as domestic Chinese companies like logic chipmaker SMIC and memory chip maker YMTC, which face U.S. export restrictions and may not be.
Schreinemacher said on Thursday the Dutch would grant licenses on a case-by-case basis and not follow instructions from Washington.
But Citi analyst Amit Harchandani said the Dutch restrictions appear comparable to those imposed on U.S. companies last year and ASML’s assessment of the impact is realistic.
For Chinese customers, the picture is less clear. “What we can say is that their ability to pursue leading-edge nodes development will be significantly curtailed,” Harchandani said.
Hesselink of ING predicted that most Chinese chip makers will now opt to focus on “trailing edge” or production of chips using slightly older technology. The Chinese may have a competitive advantage there, and ASML’s sales in China could even grow modestly.
Regardless, ASML will thrive outside China in the long run as chipmakers worldwide expand capacity, he said.
“The demand for ASML machines is not going to be impacted, it’s simply going to shift to a different region,” he said. (2)
On October 7, 2022, the Biden administration upended more than two decades of U.S. trade policy toward China when it issued sweeping new regulations on U.S. exports to China of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) and semiconductor technology. These export controls were designed after consultation with key U.S. allies, but the United States originally implemented them unilaterally. This was a major diplomatic gamble.
In the face of rapidly advancing Chinese AI and semiconductor capabilities, the United States wanted to move fast, so it was willing to take the risk of moving first alone. The United States has the strongest overall position in the global semiconductor industry, and it was by itself strong enough to reshape the Chinese semiconductor industry in the short term. Over the medium to long term, however, this move could have backfired disastrously if other countries, particularly Japan and the Netherlands, moved to fill the gaps in the Chinese market that the partial U.S. exit left.
For the full CSIS report, click here.
This commentary serves as an update to a CSIS report, “Clues to the U.S.-Dutch-Japanese Semiconductor Export Controls Deal Are Hiding in Plain Sight,” which outlines details of the U.S.-Japan-Netherlands arrangement following the United States’ October 7 export controls. The Netherlands and Japan have both shared critical new details since publication of that report.
On October 7, 2022, the United States’ Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued sweeping new controls on exports of advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment technology to China. At the time of the announcement, the controls were unilateral. However, U.S. allies, particularly Japan and the Netherlands, are also key producers of the equipment used to fabricate advanced node semiconductors. Therefore, the long-term success of the policy depended on the United States securing Dutch and Japanese cooperation to control the types of semiconductor equipment that U.S. companies do not produce and to prevent Dutch and Japanese companies from backfilling the technologies that the United States is no longer willing to sell to China.
In January 2023, the United States, the Netherlands, and Japan reportedly reached a deal establishing advanced semiconductor equipment export controls. Two months later, Dutch and Japanese governments announced their intention to proceed with new export controls on a diverse suite of semiconductor technology that will cover China. In a decision likely intended to reduce the likelihood of Chinese retaliation, neither country explicitly named China as the target of the export controls, nor did they indicate that their actions were related to an agreement with the United States. This commentary summarizes and analyzes the recent Dutch and Japanese moves and China’s reaction so far.
For the full update from the CSIS, click here.
OODAcon 2023
https://oodaloop.com/archive/2023/02/21/ooda-almanac-2023-useful-observations-for-contemplating-the-future/
The OODA C-Suite Report: Operational Intelligence for Business Leaders
https://oodaloop.com/archive/2023/06/20/the-secondary-chip-and-hardware-markets-the-strategic-importance-of-legacy-chips/
https://oodaloop.com/archive/2023/02/21/semiconductor-supply-chain-espionage-data-stolen-from-asmls-technical-repository-for-euv-chip-machines/
https://oodaloop.com/archive/2022/01/05/the-asml-holdings-factory-fire-and-specialized-manufacturing-equipment-for-semiconductor-production/
https://oodaloop.com/archive/2023/06/23/the-june-2023-ooda-network-member-meeting-weighs-in-on-doing-business-in-china-and-hong-kong-planning-for-the-wrong-type-of-war-with-china-and-the-deeply-flawed-chips-and-science-act/
https://oodaloop.com/archive/2021/11/22/scenario-planning-for-global-computer-chip-supply-chain-disruption-results-of-an-ooda-stratigame/
https://oodaloop.com/archive/2023/04/08/five-more-reasons-japan-should-be-on-your-sensemaking-radar/
https://oodaloop.com/archive/2023/03/13/secure-global-and-domestic-it-supply-chains-and-the-future-of-emerging-technology-innovation/